Multiple Myeloma - Survival Rate Statistics by Hospital
  • Home
  • Higher Risk Myeloma
  • Myeloma Blog
  • Myeloma Specialists Listing
  • Doctor Submissions
  • Contact Us

Cure Talk Interviews Gary Petersen, Editor of the Multiple Myeloma web site myelomasurvival.com

10/2/2012

3 Comments

 
Priya Menon the Scientic Media Editor for web site Cure Talk,  recently conducted an interview with me and published it at the following  link: http://trialx.com/curetalk/2012/10/cure-talk-interviews-gary-petersen-editor-myelomasurvial-com/
I was quite honored to be asked to participate in their interview series, and impressed with the quality of questions she presented.   There were three questions that I felt were exceptional and required some quite reflection.  I would like to repeat them here with my responses.

Priya: What according to you is the most interesting development in the field of multiple myeloma research that you feel is a step in the right direction?

Gary: There are a couple of developments, the first of which is the great clinical trials that have been completed. They have provided myeloma specialists with tools that are far more effective. New drugs are great, but what impresses me the most are the current developments of how to best use the existing drugs in combination for induction, transplant, and maintenance. VRd or the combination of Velcade, Revlimid, and dexamethasone as induction therapy with a 100% response rate is a prime example. If you look at these trials, they are the first line in the development of performance measures for treatment comparisons. The work of groups like the MMRC, IMF, and various international oncology groups are so important in providing the funding and resources to conduct these trials. The MMRC alone collected over $160 million dollars to fund this research, and as I know from business, “you will get the results you want if you provide a financial incentive.” And research funding grants are a great incentive to the research scientists!

The second and maybe most important development is related to the fact that multiple myeloma is curable. Studies are now available that indicate that this previously incurable disease has now shown evidence of curability in 10 to 15% of patients. They are living 10 to 15 years with no evidence of disease progression. Dr. Parameswaran Hari in his Cure Panel broadcast (available on the CureTalk website) indicated, he believes that within the next decade, 40% of patients will be cured. However, what is great about this for newly diagnosed patients is that in order to have 40% of patients to be cured in 10 years, they have to currently be in treatment. How cool is that!!!

Priya: Your site, myelomasurvial.com talks about survival statistics of various institutions dealing with myeloma treatment. What was your inspiration to start a site like this, rather than just a chronicle of your myeloma story?

Gary: Early on in my research of multiple myeloma treatment, I would do a Google search like “multiple myeloma survival rates,” and I would change it by putting in hospital names like Mayo, Dana Farber, M.D. Anderson, ad infinitum. The only thing that would come up were clinical trials, National Cancer Institute’s (SEER) survival rates, and some rates for Mayo and for UAMS. That was it! Having an operations engineering and business management background, I was shocked that performance based information was not available to the myeloma patient community.

A well-respected Senior Vice President of a multibillion dollar company, and my boss, once said, “You cannot manage what you do not measure!” From my operations engineering background, you use measurements to know where you are and to gauge the success of programs and improvements that you initiate. Total quality management has improved products for decades by using measurements to gauge improvement, so why not hospitals and their multiple myeloma programs?

But the real impetus was being in an IMF support group and watching people, my friends, die too soon. Some of them which I knew were getting inadequate care. In addition, places like Little Rock were showing survival rates of seven years whereas the National Cancer Institute indicated a survival of 33 months. I felt compelled to find a way to bridge the gap between the “What is (33months)” to the “What could be (7years)”. Yes, I was on a mission, a mission to SAVE LIFE!

Priya: What is the objective of your site?

Gary: I think there are effectively two key missions. The first is to provide a resource for the myeloma patient community to find performance-based data on survival by hospital and doctors. Currently the National Cancer Institute’s (USA) survival rate is 4 years, and that reported by United Kingdom, which has a National Health Service, reports a two-and-one-half year survival rate. However, we now see from many of the myeloma specialists that they have life expectancies of 10 years.

Their survival rates and life expectancies are now being reported on myelomasurvival.com. My objective is to allow patients to find doctors that will give them these extra six years of life! If we can do this, we would be able to save 480,000 years of LIFE. This comes from the fact that 20,000 myeloma patients are diagnosed in the US each year and the average life expectancy is 4 years. It therefore follows that there are 80,000 patients who could all live an extra six years each!

The second objective is to highlight the best myeloma programs and clinical trial results in the world, so that those programs and clinical trial results can be the new standards of excellence that other programs can emulate. One thing you will find is that this disease is so complex that it requires the skill of a myeloma specialist, and the data would confirm this. The myeloma specialist eats, drinks, and dreams this disease, and because he comes in contact and treats so many patients, he knows exactly what to do, and has seen most every eventuality. In effect, he knows so much he takes it for granted and most other hematology oncologists might be seeing only one or two patients a year and would not be familiar with all of the nuances of this disease. Do you know what the three most important things you can do as a myeloma patient to insure a long life expectancy? SPECIALIST! SPECIALIST! SPECIALIST!!!


I truly enjoy being a part of the Myeloma Cure Panel, and honored to be part of their interview series as well.  I hope you enjoy this post and find time to read the entire interview at:  http://trialx.com/curetalk/2012/10/cure-talk-interviews-gary-petersen-editor-myelomasurvial-com/   And as always "Together we can SAVE LIFE"/ Gary Petersen [email protected]
3 Comments
Pjdoherty
6/23/2017 01:57:07 pm

I am intrigued by your article. My husband is a newly diagnosed high-risk smoldering patient. Is currently on a trial at Dana-Farber with dexamethasone Revlimid in a new immunological drug called Nivolumbab. He is responding to this therapy. His IGA with never that high and his M spike was always less than .3. He has 5414 translocation in the one Q amplification. In your article you mentioned early detection is quite important. However you also spoke about having the good luck versus the bad luck. Am I assuming the bad luck is having these gene types? I realize they presented high-risk smoldering as more aggressive in and multiple myeloma intermediate. I would be interested to hear your take on this.

Reply
Gary Petersen link
7/4/2017 01:17:29 pm

Pjdoherty, I am not a doctor, just a somewhat informed patient advocate. If you look at the mSmart definitions for myeloma they believe the 4:14 translocation is intermediate risk, and an older article shows Bortezomib eliminates some of the issuers from the 4:14 translocation. Dr. Irene Gorbrial at Dana Farber is doing some great work on high risk smoldering patients, so I think getting to be her patient would be a great move on your husbands part. She is following high risk smoldering patients in a study and is a leader in the development of treatment strategies for this group. A prior Spanish study showed with Len, dex vs observation the 3-year survival rate was also higher in the treatment group (94% vs. 80%). In other word you are 3.3 times likely to be alive in 3 years if treated than if not treated. The addition of Nivolumbab a check point inhibitor is thought to provide an even greater improvement in the treatment group. The check point inhibitor turns off a cancer defense mechanism which makes the cancer cell invisible to the bodies immune system. Check point inhibitors make the cancer visable and the immune system can do its job. You are in great hands at Dana Farber! Good Luck and God Bless your families myeloma journey/Gary Petersen

Reply
Gokul Ramachandran
9/26/2018 09:28:11 am

Hi,

I was hoping to connect with you to pick your brain on some on some of the issues/challenges that you've faced along your journey with MM.

Please let me know if we can chat over a call if you're available.

Thanks,

Gokul Ramachandran

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Gary R. Petersen
    [email protected]
    CLICK HERE for my myeloma journey

    ©2012 All Rights Reserved

    Categories

    All

    Archives

    January 2025
    August 2023
    March 2023
    October 2022
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012

    RSS Feed

Web Hosting by iPage